billbays.com
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Video Archives
  • Contact

Limits of Consumerism

1/30/2009

0 Comments

 
The Chinese Premier, Wen Jiobao is blaming the U.S. excesses for bringing the world economy down. That is part of it, but less than the full story. The irony is; the Chinese, more than anyone, have been the beneficiaries of our largess. Our policies and leadership lured the American consumer with available financing to purchase “stuff ” they did not need or could defer until a time when they could better afford the purchase. Likewise, similar bad policies transferred the production of “stuff ” to the Chinese. The Chinese made good profits and lent the proceeds back to America at good interest rates and terms to keep the cycle going. This U.S.-China relationship of produce,sell, and lend was a win,win,win for China and a lose,lose,lose for America.

  When American saving rates eventually went negative did the Chinese seriously believe this would go on and on. Low savings and high consumption comes to a natural and abrupt end.

  Incredibly, we are preparing a “stimulus” which I fear much of it would attempt to prolong the consumer economy. All this is madness to me because I think we must steadily move away from a consumer-based economy.

  The Chinese caught the Americans at an opportune time. The fancy of globalisation, promoted by Wall Street, was circulating in power centers of government and business. The American consumer, armed with half-dozen credit cards could spend and lift the standard of living for the disadvantaged world. China could produce what we had previously produced at labor rates at a fraction of the dollar per hour or nearby. So Wall St. arranged for production to be transferred to China, and other Asian and Latin American countries. We could now buy these products on the cheap with our credit cards.  In the meantime our businesses were consolidating in highly leveraged fashion while the Justice Dept. winked and nodded.  Wall St. loved their “M & A’s”(mergers and acquisitions). These could be the sources of obscene profits. 

  Why did more people not see the down side of all this economic gambling? Does anyone read history anymore?

  There is more than a few sovereignty issues with globalisation. It was a mistake to “hand-off” much of our production to other countries. A sovereign nation should always retain select industry that is not necessarily restricted to national security.

  There is a lot of working difference between isolationism and globalisation.

  Now, serious Americans are left struggling to defend against socialism as a solution to our economic problems. Socialism is no answer!  We are living in critical times for our nation and the future of our free institutions.

  So, where do we go from here?  Well, the government will not have many answers or capacity to change a lot. But, they should be more concerned with genuine relief for the American people than trying to rebuilt a failed consumer economy. Obviously, all economies have a consumer component, but 2/3 of the economy, which we have practiced, is doomed for adjustment. We have too many fast-food joints, too many motels, too many cars, too much pleasure, and on and on. You have heard it said you can’t go back to a by-gone era, i.e. a lower standard of living. Thomas Wolfe even wrote a book about returning to a former time.  Well, we can’t go forward. The American people don’t have any money left. Soon, their credit cards will not be dependable. And, much of their “stuff” is near worthless.

  An envitible lower standard of living is on the horizon. Because of leverage at all levels; government, corporate, and individual all efforts to medicate our economic dilemma will fail. Should the 2 trillion infusion actually direct the economy forward again it would be temporary at best. The borrowing for the “stimulus” would in time produce an even more serious crisis. Bearing in mind we have multiple approaching problems with money needs such as Medicare and Social Security. That is why the government should concern itself with physical suffering to compliment our vast social welfare net. Of course, this could involve work projects, job training. etc. But, the government needs the insight  to know they can make matters worse. Things can correct in a decade or more and move forward again, in a meaningful way.



0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Bill Bays

    Archives

    April 2016
    August 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Website by Creative Cat
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Video Archives
  • Contact